Judge Larry Alan Burns, Federal District Court of the Southern District of California, under scrutiny.  What better person to select to exemplify Federal Court corruption, a judge educated at a Nazarene college, juris doctorate from a Catholic university, University of San Diego, and who from the bench ruled that the Cross is not a religious symbol! 

      Evidence to support accusations that Judge Larry Burns has blatantly abused judicial discretion, violated oath of office, fabricated, twisted, and intentionally and maliciously misconstrued and misrepresented facts for apparent self-serving agendas and bias is published in the article 'Evidence and Facts To Support No Confidence In The Judiciary'.  The article refers to court documents that specifically demonstrate that Burns maliciously lied about facts.  Several cases are focused on including one involving a victimized couple who came before him pro se with an issue of government employees who had repeatedly violated their constitutional rights, unjustly threatened them with bodily harm, stalked them and terrorized them causing so much mental harm they could not function properly for their livelihood.

       Burns twisted facts, and accepted twisted facts from defense attorney to protect the government employees from liability.  The defendants invoked immunity using twisted and misrepresented facts, therefore the defendants never answered the complaint because Burns accepted those facts despite their obvious falsehood and misconstruction of actual fact.  When the couple appealed the case in forma pauperis Burns interfered by lying and twisting facts again.  He pointed to facts he claimed existed in the record, but in fact did not exist, and from these fictitious facts claimed the couple lied in their complaint for damages.  He claimed the pro se couple asked for damages based on lost wages from employment however their complaint and administrative claim stated their claimed loss was an expected salary.  It was based on work they had been doing, which was grant writing, and the financial loss was the expected salary income from grants that could have been awarded had they not been interfered with.  Grant writing was wrongfully interfered with therefore the claimed loss was based on denial of ability to submit grants and be able to have a salary from them.

      Armed with his invented fact he claimed the couple either lied in their complaint or lied in their application to proceed in forma pauperis.  However his lie can be detected by examination of the record therefore his lie can be evidenced.  The public can access the records therefore anyone can learn the truth of the matter.  In the end Larry Alan Burns will pay a high price for lying as it is grounds to be impeached and be deprived of his job.

      In another case Burns twisted facts and seized on unrelated rules to strip a U.S. Ambassador to Russia of his diplomatic immunity involving an auto accident in that country. See: Kashin v. Kent page.

      United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states "whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States." 

Return To Entry Page